8
0
mirror of https://github.com/FirebirdSQL/firebird.git synced 2025-01-22 20:43:02 +01:00

Fix a couple typos

This commit is contained in:
skidder 2003-07-28 09:29:40 +00:00
parent 0b9c77c00b
commit 1ca335f68e

View File

@ -79,13 +79,13 @@ are actually locked and DO fall under search condition specified in WHERE clause
if this search condition depends only on a record to be returned (for example, it
contains no subqueries reading mutable tables, etc). It also guaranties that
no rows not falling under search condition are locked by the statement. It doesn't
guaranty that there is no rows falling under search condition, but not locked
guaranty that there are no rows falling under search condition, but not locked
(this may happen if other parallel transactions commit their changes during
execution of locking statement).
Engine locks rows at fetch time. This has important consequences if you lock
several rows at once. By default, access methods for Firebird databases
fetch results is packs of a few hundred rows. Most access components may not
fetch results in packs of a few hundred rows. Most access components may not
give you the rows contained in the last fetched packed where error happened.
You may use FOR UPDATE clause to prevent usage of buffered fetches (and may
use positioned updates feature) or set fetch buffer size to 1 in your access