8
0
mirror of https://github.com/FirebirdSQL/firebird.git synced 2025-01-23 15:23:02 +01:00
Commit Graph

13465 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
robocop
9eecdd8066 Nickolay says the local variable is different from the outer variable.
Therefore, renamed the inner variable to avoid warning found by D. Sibiryakov. Some integer types made const, too.
2004-07-30 04:58:26 +00:00
fsg
182124e9e8 increment build number 2004-07-30 01:08:02 +00:00
fsg
b9205cd4ea nightly update 2004-07-30 01:07:58 +00:00
skidder
942c5f922b increment build number 2004-07-29 17:44:11 +00:00
skidder
6129db2caa Correct a couple errors I introduced during int->size_t transition for array indexing 2004-07-29 17:44:03 +00:00
fsg
e8b0e91d3a increment build number 2004-07-27 01:07:55 +00:00
fsg
866d40bc5c nightly update 2004-07-27 01:07:51 +00:00
skidder
8d8597643e increment build number 2004-07-26 21:32:44 +00:00
skidder
a624a4ac53 Small addition to my previous LIKE fix 2004-07-26 21:32:41 +00:00
fsg
634b4c2530 increment build number 2004-07-23 01:07:40 +00:00
fsg
1b06abe41a nightly update 2004-07-23 01:07:36 +00:00
robocop
c0a5e53426 increment build number 2004-07-22 07:18:01 +00:00
robocop
733859bc09 increment build number 2004-07-22 07:18:00 +00:00
robocop
a5ceabacc8 Style and simplification 2004-07-22 07:17:58 +00:00
robocop
18b6781b8d increment build number 2004-07-22 07:17:21 +00:00
robocop
f7ea2ac074 Fix annoying warnings that appeared when Blas dropped a file with C++ typed constants for the isc_dyn_ values and others. 2004-07-22 07:17:17 +00:00
robocop
1cd5f7b4a8 increment build number 2004-07-22 07:15:13 +00:00
robocop
1052c9c2ce increment build number 2004-07-22 07:15:11 +00:00
robocop
507f53d9bd Style and misc 2004-07-22 07:15:10 +00:00
fsg
b4c27872de increment build number 2004-07-22 01:07:16 +00:00
fsg
fcf625beda nightly update 2004-07-22 01:07:12 +00:00
brodsom
64c62bf519 increment build number 2004-07-21 11:02:11 +00:00
brodsom
65bf4e9a37 -Update 2004-07-21 11:02:08 +00:00
brodsom
aef93b4408 increment build number 2004-07-21 10:34:31 +00:00
brodsom
da46a55b16 -Correction (Found by Claudio) 2004-07-21 10:34:27 +00:00
hvlad
46bcfa427d increment build number 2004-07-21 06:33:59 +00:00
hvlad
47a12b9a3d Fix for lost least significant bits of value when rounding floating-point value to int \ int64 value 2004-07-21 06:33:57 +00:00
fsg
03e41d3800 increment build number 2004-07-21 01:10:39 +00:00
fsg
6645b2f685 increment build number 2004-07-21 01:09:41 +00:00
fsg
110117d668 nightly update 2004-07-21 01:09:21 +00:00
skidder
15b656bc7d increment build number 2004-07-20 22:56:36 +00:00
skidder
2f7b378158 Fix another problem with my LIKE evaluator 2004-07-20 22:56:32 +00:00
arnobrinkman
5f9ea74f0d increment build number 2004-07-20 18:57:46 +00:00
arnobrinkman
cf01406ee8 increment build number 2004-07-20 18:57:45 +00:00
arnobrinkman
cd36ca6e05 fix bug in ignore_nulls part 2004-07-20 18:57:42 +00:00
arnobrinkman
448e3d3997 increment build number 2004-07-20 18:56:20 +00:00
arnobrinkman
4cdd0449e1 increment build number 2004-07-20 18:55:07 +00:00
arnobrinkman
f2345109a0 Bugfix: optimizer didn't add boolean-node when it was a OR operator and no index could be used.
This caused unnecessary evaluation of joined rse's to that rse.
2004-07-20 18:55:03 +00:00
fsg
28efe8bf1d increment build number 2004-07-17 01:06:39 +00:00
fsg
a9fbfec7aa nightly update 2004-07-17 01:06:33 +00:00
skidder
74798953c2 increment build number 2004-07-17 00:13:37 +00:00
skidder
d06f13820c increment build number 2004-07-17 00:13:36 +00:00
skidder
04076ea1ff size_t is more correct type for container sizes and indices 2004-07-17 00:13:34 +00:00
skidder
751def6eaf increment build number 2004-07-16 23:06:33 +00:00
skidder
5494b34caa size_t is more correct type for container sizes and indices 2004-07-16 23:06:31 +00:00
skidder
e0656da2ba increment build number 2004-07-16 23:06:30 +00:00
skidder
71f2ffb3b4 increment build number 2004-07-16 23:06:12 +00:00
skidder
c1f4cb8636 increment build number 2004-07-16 23:06:09 +00:00
arnobrinkman
10bea870c8 increment build number 2004-07-16 01:30:37 +00:00
arnobrinkman
945fefb3b2 When we ignore NULLs in the index then we must already skip them very efficiently from the start. 2004-07-16 01:30:33 +00:00