robocop
511d0705a9
increment build number
2005-04-28 05:27:51 +00:00
robocop
c0467fe25c
increment build number
2005-04-28 05:27:48 +00:00
fsg
2c14d4106d
increment build number
2005-04-28 01:21:33 +00:00
dimitr
3a6a89ea56
increment build number
2005-04-27 18:06:35 +00:00
dimitr
4f7ad04fc4
Minor corrections.
2005-04-27 18:06:19 +00:00
dimitr
7d8be5d4a8
increment build number
2005-04-27 17:57:13 +00:00
fsg
49ce53e3f3
increment build number
2005-04-27 01:22:50 +00:00
fsg
e5e2e94470
increment build number
2005-04-27 01:21:45 +00:00
arnobrinkman
a2f6fe3d6b
increment build number
2005-04-26 13:52:09 +00:00
arnobrinkman
6905518173
increment build number
2005-04-26 13:32:46 +00:00
arnobrinkman
9607d3664b
increment build number
2005-04-26 11:46:17 +00:00
kkuznetsov
d90f3e5fe4
increment build number
2005-04-26 07:32:27 +00:00
kkuznetsov
a88a9d0e1e
increment build number
2005-04-26 07:32:05 +00:00
kkuznetsov
d846cb366c
increment build number
2005-04-26 07:32:04 +00:00
kkuznetsov
4011feb354
increment build number
2005-04-26 07:32:00 +00:00
kkuznetsov
5f398cfd5f
increment build number
2005-04-26 07:31:54 +00:00
kkuznetsov
75d2ea3bcc
increment build number
2005-04-26 07:31:15 +00:00
dimitr
14ae4dc31c
Check whether a row we perform positioned update/delete against is actually fetched.
2005-04-25 20:31:52 +00:00
dimitr
3cca73bdb0
Corrected the returned error code.
2005-04-25 19:45:26 +00:00
arnobrinkman
64e34a0109
Add comment
2005-04-25 06:54:45 +00:00
arnobrinkman
4b978cf19e
Fix bug #1168898
...
With sub-select in CHECK constraint and CHECK constraint is part of domain.
A table T with single column C who uses this domain.
Then no VIEW could be created on Table T which uses simple column C.
2005-04-24 18:32:16 +00:00
dimitr
c01b84565a
Tuned reduce factors again.
2005-04-23 12:16:11 +00:00
arnobrinkman
b4b0a354ca
Fix bug with ORDER BY and DISTINCT on OUTER JOIN where the ORDER BY clause was given to a deeper rse, but shouldn't because the distinct should be applied first.
...
Reproducable query:
SELECT
DISTINCT r.rdb$relation_name, r.rdb$relation_id
FROM
rdb$relations r
LEFT JOIN rdb$relation_fields f ON (f.rdb$relation_name = r.rdb$relation_name)
ORDER BY
r.rdb$relation_id
2005-04-21 17:35:44 +00:00
kkuznetsov
cefe703e55
increment build number
2005-04-20 14:30:42 +00:00
kkuznetsov
760cb95d6b
increment build number
2005-04-20 14:29:29 +00:00
arnobrinkman
b7c5698ddd
increment build number
2005-04-20 13:07:02 +00:00
kkuznetsov
b537ab9547
increment build number
2005-04-20 07:48:00 +00:00
fsg
2966d3bad4
increment build number
2005-04-20 01:27:36 +00:00
arnobrinkman
ff3362736b
increment build number
2005-04-19 09:56:08 +00:00
kkuznetsov
77572bda2c
increment build number
2005-04-19 08:23:56 +00:00
kkuznetsov
9ee9bd5dbe
increment build number
2005-04-19 08:05:47 +00:00
fsg
d41e4f8e83
increment build number
2005-04-19 01:18:52 +00:00
kkuznetsov
63680f96cf
increment build number
2005-04-18 16:06:25 +00:00
kkuznetsov
f19f9902cf
increment build number
2005-04-18 16:05:13 +00:00
kkuznetsov
91c5664cad
increment build number
2005-04-18 16:05:10 +00:00
kkuznetsov
f9b7eedf21
increment build number
2005-04-18 16:03:15 +00:00
robocop
05b3a9aa1e
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:36:06 +00:00
robocop
71c5e1ee4d
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:32:40 +00:00
robocop
b609407d9b
We can live with static_cast for these cases.
2005-04-18 03:32:35 +00:00
robocop
1bb1de2d5e
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:26:48 +00:00
robocop
424f40a84b
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:25:59 +00:00
robocop
4c4b42c7c0
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:24:31 +00:00
robocop
b51316e88b
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:24:25 +00:00
robocop
41b4413530
Fix recently committed strange indentation.
2005-04-18 03:22:31 +00:00
robocop
0dcfe7d0b0
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:21:47 +00:00
fsg
9b4627f997
increment build number
2005-04-17 01:15:04 +00:00
asfernandes
c95c8ac47e
increment build number
2005-04-16 18:49:26 +00:00
dimitr
bba5dd5878
increment build number
2005-04-16 18:21:16 +00:00
dimitr
fd471aa39d
increment build number
2005-04-16 17:29:07 +00:00
dimitr
79f50250ff
Third attempt to apply reduced selectivity properly.
2005-04-16 17:28:45 +00:00