8645 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
dimitr	8bb66101e4	increment build number	2004-08-01 17:44:28 +00:00
robocop	8da5e11178	increment build number	2004-08-01 07:01:05 +00:00
robocop	d26d5328d4	Fix subtle bug introduced by Alex during fun.epp refactoring that prevented the engine to detect when the invoked UDF has returned NULL.	2004-08-01 07:00:59 +00:00
fsg	f8bae233e5	increment build number	2004-07-31 01:07:56 +00:00
skidder	e2d85c8a24	increment build number	2004-07-30 22:38:09 +00:00
skidder	b980507ad2	Valgrind support	2004-07-30 22:38:08 +00:00
skidder	af4847e82d	increment build number	2004-07-30 22:38:04 +00:00
skidder	9689d8083d	increment build number	2004-07-30 22:37:56 +00:00
robocop	85226b170a	increment build number	2004-07-30 05:56:38 +00:00
robocop	53c645ce82	Temporary fix for first problem reported by Adriano dos Santos Fernandes. ... Server should continue working normally if gbak tries to restore a db in a forbidden path. Now mutex is unlocked and server can continue working. However, engine doesn't unload the db so it still thinks there's an active connection. The proper fix should come from Alex, that probably involves throwing an exception to activate the code inside the catch() section.	2004-07-30 05:56:35 +00:00
robocop	b02705d980	increment build number	2004-07-30 04:58:30 +00:00
robocop	9eecdd8066	Nickolay says the local variable is different from the outer variable. ... Therefore, renamed the inner variable to avoid warning found by D. Sibiryakov. Some integer types made const, too.	2004-07-30 04:58:26 +00:00
fsg	182124e9e8	increment build number	2004-07-30 01:08:02 +00:00
skidder	942c5f922b	increment build number	2004-07-29 17:44:11 +00:00
fsg	e8b0e91d3a	increment build number	2004-07-27 01:07:55 +00:00
skidder	8d8597643e	increment build number	2004-07-26 21:32:44 +00:00
skidder	a624a4ac53	Small addition to my previous LIKE fix	2004-07-26 21:32:41 +00:00
fsg	634b4c2530	increment build number	2004-07-23 01:07:40 +00:00
robocop	733859bc09	increment build number	2004-07-22 07:18:00 +00:00
robocop	18b6781b8d	increment build number	2004-07-22 07:17:21 +00:00
robocop	1cd5f7b4a8	increment build number	2004-07-22 07:15:13 +00:00
robocop	1052c9c2ce	increment build number	2004-07-22 07:15:11 +00:00
robocop	507f53d9bd	Style and misc	2004-07-22 07:15:10 +00:00
fsg	b4c27872de	increment build number	2004-07-22 01:07:16 +00:00
brodsom	64c62bf519	increment build number	2004-07-21 11:02:11 +00:00
brodsom	aef93b4408	increment build number	2004-07-21 10:34:31 +00:00
hvlad	46bcfa427d	increment build number	2004-07-21 06:33:59 +00:00
hvlad	47a12b9a3d	Fix for lost least significant bits of value when rounding floating-point value to int \ int64 value	2004-07-21 06:33:57 +00:00
fsg	03e41d3800	increment build number	2004-07-21 01:10:39 +00:00
fsg	6645b2f685	increment build number	2004-07-21 01:09:41 +00:00
skidder	15b656bc7d	increment build number	2004-07-20 22:56:36 +00:00
skidder	2f7b378158	Fix another problem with my LIKE evaluator	2004-07-20 22:56:32 +00:00
arnobrinkman	5f9ea74f0d	increment build number	2004-07-20 18:57:46 +00:00
arnobrinkman	cf01406ee8	increment build number	2004-07-20 18:57:45 +00:00
arnobrinkman	cd36ca6e05	fix bug in ignore_nulls part	2004-07-20 18:57:42 +00:00
arnobrinkman	448e3d3997	increment build number	2004-07-20 18:56:20 +00:00
arnobrinkman	f2345109a0	Bugfix: optimizer didn't add boolean-node when it was a OR operator and no index could be used. ... This caused unnecessary evaluation of joined rse's to that rse.	2004-07-20 18:55:03 +00:00
fsg	28efe8bf1d	increment build number	2004-07-17 01:06:39 +00:00
skidder	d06f13820c	increment build number	2004-07-17 00:13:36 +00:00
skidder	04076ea1ff	size_t is more correct type for container sizes and indices	2004-07-17 00:13:34 +00:00
skidder	751def6eaf	increment build number	2004-07-16 23:06:33 +00:00
skidder	5494b34caa	size_t is more correct type for container sizes and indices	2004-07-16 23:06:31 +00:00
skidder	e0656da2ba	increment build number	2004-07-16 23:06:30 +00:00
skidder	71f2ffb3b4	increment build number	2004-07-16 23:06:12 +00:00
skidder	c1f4cb8636	increment build number	2004-07-16 23:06:09 +00:00
arnobrinkman	10bea870c8	increment build number	2004-07-16 01:30:37 +00:00
arnobrinkman	945fefb3b2	When we ignore NULLs in the index then we must already skip them very efficiently from the start.	2004-07-16 01:30:33 +00:00
fsg	5d6672f232	increment build number	2004-07-16 01:08:19 +00:00
arnobrinkman	9e67406e38	increment build number	2004-07-15 23:01:19 +00:00
arnobrinkman	401fb7d12f	1) Fix starting with and empty string index problem where empty string is passed in parameter. (STARTING WITH ?) ? = '' ... 2) New index structure ensures that NULLs cannot hold the same key-value as a data value. 3) Ignore NULLs already on scanning index where possible.	2004-07-15 23:01:12 +00:00