fsg
49ce53e3f3
increment build number
2005-04-27 01:22:50 +00:00
fsg
e5e2e94470
increment build number
2005-04-27 01:21:45 +00:00
arnobrinkman
a2f6fe3d6b
increment build number
2005-04-26 13:52:09 +00:00
arnobrinkman
6905518173
increment build number
2005-04-26 13:32:46 +00:00
arnobrinkman
9607d3664b
increment build number
2005-04-26 11:46:17 +00:00
kkuznetsov
d90f3e5fe4
increment build number
2005-04-26 07:32:27 +00:00
kkuznetsov
a88a9d0e1e
increment build number
2005-04-26 07:32:05 +00:00
kkuznetsov
d846cb366c
increment build number
2005-04-26 07:32:04 +00:00
kkuznetsov
4011feb354
increment build number
2005-04-26 07:32:00 +00:00
kkuznetsov
5f398cfd5f
increment build number
2005-04-26 07:31:54 +00:00
kkuznetsov
75d2ea3bcc
increment build number
2005-04-26 07:31:15 +00:00
dimitr
14ae4dc31c
Check whether a row we perform positioned update/delete against is actually fetched.
2005-04-25 20:31:52 +00:00
dimitr
3cca73bdb0
Corrected the returned error code.
2005-04-25 19:45:26 +00:00
arnobrinkman
64e34a0109
Add comment
2005-04-25 06:54:45 +00:00
arnobrinkman
4b978cf19e
Fix bug #1168898
...
With sub-select in CHECK constraint and CHECK constraint is part of domain.
A table T with single column C who uses this domain.
Then no VIEW could be created on Table T which uses simple column C.
2005-04-24 18:32:16 +00:00
dimitr
c01b84565a
Tuned reduce factors again.
2005-04-23 12:16:11 +00:00
arnobrinkman
b4b0a354ca
Fix bug with ORDER BY and DISTINCT on OUTER JOIN where the ORDER BY clause was given to a deeper rse, but shouldn't because the distinct should be applied first.
...
Reproducable query:
SELECT
DISTINCT r.rdb$relation_name, r.rdb$relation_id
FROM
rdb$relations r
LEFT JOIN rdb$relation_fields f ON (f.rdb$relation_name = r.rdb$relation_name)
ORDER BY
r.rdb$relation_id
2005-04-21 17:35:44 +00:00
kkuznetsov
cefe703e55
increment build number
2005-04-20 14:30:42 +00:00
kkuznetsov
760cb95d6b
increment build number
2005-04-20 14:29:29 +00:00
arnobrinkman
b7c5698ddd
increment build number
2005-04-20 13:07:02 +00:00
kkuznetsov
b537ab9547
increment build number
2005-04-20 07:48:00 +00:00
fsg
2966d3bad4
increment build number
2005-04-20 01:27:36 +00:00
arnobrinkman
ff3362736b
increment build number
2005-04-19 09:56:08 +00:00
kkuznetsov
77572bda2c
increment build number
2005-04-19 08:23:56 +00:00
kkuznetsov
9ee9bd5dbe
increment build number
2005-04-19 08:05:47 +00:00
fsg
d41e4f8e83
increment build number
2005-04-19 01:18:52 +00:00
kkuznetsov
63680f96cf
increment build number
2005-04-18 16:06:25 +00:00
kkuznetsov
f19f9902cf
increment build number
2005-04-18 16:05:13 +00:00
kkuznetsov
91c5664cad
increment build number
2005-04-18 16:05:10 +00:00
kkuznetsov
f9b7eedf21
increment build number
2005-04-18 16:03:15 +00:00
robocop
05b3a9aa1e
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:36:06 +00:00
robocop
71c5e1ee4d
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:32:40 +00:00
robocop
b609407d9b
We can live with static_cast for these cases.
2005-04-18 03:32:35 +00:00
robocop
1bb1de2d5e
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:26:48 +00:00
robocop
424f40a84b
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:25:59 +00:00
robocop
4c4b42c7c0
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:24:31 +00:00
robocop
b51316e88b
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:24:25 +00:00
robocop
41b4413530
Fix recently committed strange indentation.
2005-04-18 03:22:31 +00:00
robocop
0dcfe7d0b0
increment build number
2005-04-18 03:21:47 +00:00
fsg
9b4627f997
increment build number
2005-04-17 01:15:04 +00:00
asfernandes
c95c8ac47e
increment build number
2005-04-16 18:49:26 +00:00
dimitr
bba5dd5878
increment build number
2005-04-16 18:21:16 +00:00
dimitr
fd471aa39d
increment build number
2005-04-16 17:29:07 +00:00
dimitr
79f50250ff
Third attempt to apply reduced selectivity properly.
2005-04-16 17:28:45 +00:00
dimitr
858ffad5e0
increment build number
2005-04-16 16:57:16 +00:00
dimitr
2045d89a76
Code simplification and some style corrections.
2005-04-16 16:57:06 +00:00
fsg
8d51260042
increment build number
2005-04-16 01:21:01 +00:00
dimitr
2891b28163
increment build number
2005-04-15 14:55:37 +00:00
dimitr
4410fb9f97
1) Fixed wrong index usage for nested loop joins (indexed relationship must be a requirement).
...
2) Better optimizaton for tables with zero selectivities.
3) Fixed wrong choice of index in the case of the same selectivity and number of indices.
4) Fixed wrong total selectivity calculated for compound non-equality comparisons.
5) Some constants tuning based on two weeks of the extreme testing.
Subject of Arno's review, although all my tests show much better results without any regressions.
2005-04-15 14:54:59 +00:00
dimitr
f24678d667
increment build number
2005-04-15 14:34:06 +00:00